indoors. natural and supplementary lighting.

*3

*2

*1

• I took some pictures inside my living room, trying supplementary and natural lights.

-Supplementary lights: I had a lamp used to light the scene while filming  and one very soft light with a blue filter. They didn't really work, as I couldn't get the room to be enough dark to really appreciate the supplementary lightening s good as it could be.

(*1) on this shot i used a supplementary strong light coming from left side and a soft blue filtered light from the right, which didn't stand as I wanted to. The supplementary lights were one too powerful, and the blue one too soft, so take a right picture not burned was difficult.
I had to take it with a short exposure time. a high ISO number wasn't necessary either.
But the only thing I was really happy about this photograph was that the smoke was well visible, for the rest, I think this shooting was very unsuccessful.

 (*2 & *3) On this shoots I did use a longer exposition time and a little higher ISO number as I had used the natural light coming from the window place on the right side, so all what I had to do was be able to keep my position a bit longer with no shake my hands to have a sharp image. 

 The problem with this photography was the actual camera, I was happy with the shot, but my camera crops a side of the image once taken, ( it's broken), so it was kind of a nightmare to be able to position the subject on the right place for the final image.

I also took some pictures at the Tattoo convention , using strictly the lighting they already had set, which was enough bright to allow me to take fast shoots, and catch the people while working and moving, and obtaining clear images.
(I used 200-400 iso number and a exposition about 1/80)
Again all the complication of those shots was to position my subject on the correct place, as the camera crops a side of the photograph you are taking.